Base and endurance
Easy running, long sessions and back-to-back training build the ability to keep moving for hours without turning every workout into a hard day.
Personal training file · Nice 100M
The race runs through the French Alps, but most of my preparation happens in Hilversum. I combine easy running with repeated climbs and descents on Anna’s Berg, strength work, the Technogym Climb Excite and Skillrun, nutrition and equipment tests, and deliberate recovery. The aim is not to recreate the Alps, but to make the problems of 165 kilometres, 8,900 metres of climbing and more than 10,000 metres of descending smaller, one by one.
My approach at a glance
My base remains a high volume of easy running and consistent recovery. On top of that, I train the specific demands that make the Nice 100M difficult: long climbing, controlled descending, hours of purposeful hiking, eating while tired, managing heat and darkness, and making sensible decisions as fatigue builds.
Easy running, long sessions and back-to-back training build the ability to keep moving for hours without turning every workout into a hard day.
Anna’s Berg, strength training, the Technogym Climb Excite and Skillrun give my legs repeatable load for long climbs and more than 10,000 metres of descending.
Long sessions are also rehearsals for carbohydrates, hydration, my race vest, clothing and headlamps. A hard block only counts if I absorb it afterwards.
My training map
The Nice 100M is too large to treat as a single training task. I split it into separate problems. Each block explains what can go wrong, what I train and how that fits into an ordinary week in Hilversum.
Risk: Nice contains more than 10,000 metres of descending. If I create too much braking damage in the first half, I will pay for it later.
What I train: controlled descending, box step-downs, Bulgarian split-squat holds, single-leg stability, strength work and hill loops where technique still matters when I am tired.
What that looks like: lap after lap on Anna’s Berg in Hilversum. It is not the Alps, but repeating the same slope lets me recognise rhythm, control and fatigue.
Why: I want to be able to steer through the final descents, not simply fall forwards.
Risk: living in the Netherlands does not automatically prepare the legs for hours of climbing and descending. My cardiovascular fitness can be good while my legs are still not race-ready.
What I train: Technogym Climb Excite, Technogym Skillrun, power hiking, strength work, stairs and long blocks that alternate running and hiking.
What that looks like: sometimes mountain training is simply an evening at SportCity: strength first, then a long climb on the machine. Not glamorous, but specific enough to strengthen the chassis.
Why: I cannot copy the Alps, but I can recreate some of the fatigue my legs will experience there.
Risk: nutrition is not a minor detail over 100 miles. If my stomach shuts down, pace becomes irrelevant.
What I train: 80–90 grams of carbohydrate per hour, different flavours and textures, drinking under fatigue and eating while I continue moving.
What that looks like: long sessions are rehearsals for bottles, gels, bars, salt, water and the moment I no longer want to eat but still need to.
Why: race-day nutrition should feel like boring, practised behaviour rather than an experiment.
Risk: fatigue makes posture smaller, foot placement less precise and every mistake more expensive on technical terrain.
What I train: cadence, foot placement, trunk control, single-leg stability, controlled descending and hiking without collapsing through the hips.
What that looks like: short stability work at home, box step-downs, strength training and attention to how my legs land late in easy runs.
Why: speed only helps while I remain in control. Nice rewards repeatable technique, not bravado.
Risk: Côte d’Azur sounds warm, but the race starts in the mountains. Within one race I may face warmth, cold, darkness, wind, sweating and rapid cooling.
What I train: headlamp use, clothing decisions, carrying water, equipment checklists, cooling, staying warm and making decisions while tired.
What that looks like: laying out equipment as if it were race day, running with a loaded vest when it feels excessive in the Netherlands, and studying course videos before the race.
Why: fatigue makes simple choices harder, so I want as many of those choices as possible to be familiar.
Risk: 165 kilometres is too large to hold in my head all at once.
What I train: section thinking, checkpoint study, course videos, mental cues for each phase and scenarios for difficult moments.
What that looks like: I pause videos to study paths, aid stations, packs, lamps, running style and how people move when fatigue becomes obvious.
Why: on 25 September I do not want to think “another 100 miles”. I want to ask: what is the next correct action before the next aid station?
Latest training block · 11–12 July 2026
A two-day block on Anna’s Berg: two hours of climbing with a 9 kg pack on Saturday, followed by more hill work on tired legs on Sunday. The combined 30.6 kilometres, more than 2,200 metres of climbing and controlled descending gave me confidence: strong legs, stable technique and no pain.
I climbed with 9 kg of extra weight for the first two hours. I removed the pack for the descents, keeping the added load in the climbing while staying technically controlled downhill.
A second hill session with my race vest made the block specific to Nice. The value was not one heroic workout, but having to climb and descend again while Saturday was still present in my legs.
The local load on glutes, quads and tendons was greater than the low average heart rate suggested. I therefore followed the block with 48–72 hours of recovery. Saturday’s carbohydrate intake, at roughly 43 grams per hour, was also below my target, so future specific sessions will progress towards 70–90 grams per hour.
30.6 km · 5:06 · 2,221 m+
The real constraint
On paper, the Nice 100M is a mountain ultra from Auron to Nice. In my calendar it means training around family life, work, school runs, shopping, fatigue and the question of how to prepare seriously without making everything at home revolve around my race.
I call some workouts “ninja sessions”: get up early, train while the house is still asleep and return before the day properly begins. Not because that is heroic, but because it is practical. Preparing for 100 miles only works if the people around me do not pay the price every week.
I cannot copy the mountains here. What I can do is split the race into problems: descending, braking with tired quads, eating without appetite, hiking without collapsing, starting conservatively and repeating those skills until they become less uncertain.
Sometimes that means a long run. Sometimes it is a session on the Technogym Climb Excite. Sometimes it is dozens of short repeats on Anna’s Berg. Sometimes it is an office-day rest day, because recovery is training too.
Who is writing this
I live in Hilversum, surrounded by heathland and woodland but without real mountains. I have run since my student days in Amsterdam, alongside field hockey, and gradually increased my focus on running from 2016 onwards.
In 2019, a close friend in Geneva told me about the trail races she ran. In 2021 I entered the Matterhorn Ultraks Mountain race, my first running event. I completed the final metres in Zermatt with my children. Since then, I have increased both distance and elevation almost every year.
I spend a great deal of time preparing and share the lessons with runners planning a mountain ultra, as well as people who want to understand what sits behind a start number.
My parents-in-law live with dementia. In 2025 I ran the Monte Rosa Trail for Alzheimer Nederland and together we raised more than €5,300. In 2026 I am doing it again with the Nice 100M.
I am not a coach. I am interested in running, trails and data, and I share my own preparation even when it is untidy because I work full-time, have three children and need the process to remain sustainable at home.
What it really looks like
Anna’s Berg is not an Alpine pass. It is a small Dutch hill I have repeated often enough to know almost too well. That is precisely why it is useful: I can focus on breathing, foot placement, quads, descending, eating and what happens when repetition becomes boring.
Nice will not only be difficult during spectacular moments. It will also be difficult because simple actions must continue when I am tired.
A large part of my training must fit around family life. Sometimes that means shoes on before the rest of the house has properly started the day, training completed, then breakfast, school, work and everything else.
It may sound less romantic than mountain training, but for me that is the point: prepare for a huge race without requiring my whole environment to move with it.
Thursday is my fixed rest day. During holidays I also plan complete family and travel days without inventing a recovery jog. Sometimes the best training is a normal office day, a walk with the family, enough food, an early night and no extra workout because the data happens to look good.
Ultra preparation requires discipline to train, but also discipline to stop.
Lessons from previous runners
I have not copied personal reports from previous Nice 100M runners directly onto this page. Some were shared privately and the details would create too much noise. The recurring patterns, however, are too useful to ignore.
The common thread is clear: Nice requires more than fitness. It demands durable legs, sensible layering, a tested nutrition plan and the restraint to reach the second half without destroyed quads.
Several runners describe the course as rougher and more technical than expected, with extensive singletrack and long steep descents. I therefore train not only to climb well, but to retain control late in the race.
Long climbs can require repeated high steps and sustained muscular work. Box step-ups, stair climbing, power hiking and single-leg strength remain part of the preparation.
The race can move through cold, snow, wind and ice before becoming warm towards Nice. The lesson is not simply “wear more”, but stay dry, avoid overheating on climbs and add warm layers when they are actually needed.
Soup, broth and cola may help, but aid stations do not always provide the solid food you hope for at exactly the right moment. My own nutrition and gut training remain the foundation.
Small equipment choices become large problems after many hours. I test layers, shorts, socks, vest, salt, hydration and everything that remains in prolonged contact with my skin or stomach.
The race may begin in winter-like conditions and finish beside the Mediterranean. That contrast makes Nice beautiful, but also deceptive. My preparation needs to cover both worlds.
Periodised nutrition
For Nice I need to train not only my legs, but also my gut and the decisions I make around food. My approach is influenced by Asker Jeukendrup’s work on gut training and nutritional adaptation in endurance sport.
Office, rest and recovery days do not need to resemble race-day nutrition. The priority is normal food, enough protein and supporting recovery without adding fuel that the work does not require.
During long sessions I practise drinking, gels, bars, salt and timing. It is a skill: reach for a bottle, keep eating without appetite and learn what my stomach accepts after hours of movement.
As race simulations become more specific, I build towards the carbohydrate intake I want to tolerate during Nice: roughly 80–90 grams per hour in relevant sessions, using different flavours and formats.
The goal is not an impressive nutrition plan on paper. The goal is for eating and drinking on 25 September to feel routine: start early, keep repeating, recognise small problems and do not wait until the tank is empty.
Jeukendrup describes the gastrointestinal system as central to delivering carbohydrate and fluid during prolonged exercise, with GI problems common among endurance athletes. Nutritional training may improve tolerance and reduce symptoms. That is why nutrition is a training component for me, not a race-day afterthought.
Body weight without obsession
In a race with thousands of metres of descending, total mass matters because every kilogram must be decelerated repeatedly. Aggressive weight loss, however, can cost recovery, glycogen and strength. The aim is not the lowest number, but a body that reaches the start lighter, strong and fully fuelled.
Compared with my preparation for Verbier in 2023, the current trend is slightly lighter, with a lower estimated body-fat percentage and a similar estimated muscle share on the same home scale. I deliberately do not publish daily targets.
Fluid, salt, carbohydrate, gut contents and creatine can visibly change weight and estimated body composition from day to day. I therefore look at multi-week trends and training quality rather than one reading.
If recovery, sleep, strength, mood or training quality decline, the energy deficit is too large. At that point, becoming lighter becomes more expensive for Nice.
The final days before Nice are not for further weight loss. They are for glycogen, hydration and gastrointestinal calm. I want to start strong and stable, not dehydrated with an attractive scale reading.
Race Study Room
A GPX file does not show how a trail feels. Video reveals where runners slow down, how narrow the paths are, what technical descents look like, how aid stations operate, what people wear and how they move when fatigue becomes visible.
Sometimes I replay a section several times. Recognition may save time, stress and poor decisions later.
Sources and influences
This is my personal preparation, not a universal blueprint. I combine official race information, my own experience, ideas from specialists, data, videos and lessons from runners who have completed Nice.
The official UTMB pages and GPX files are the basis for the course, distance, elevation, equipment, aid stations and time limits.
Official Nice 100M pageI use a section plan, course videos, online GPX files, finisher reports and information shared through TrailTalk and Strava to make the race less abstract.
Read my Nice 100M route guideI try to translate ideas from Scott Johnston and Jason Koop into my own setting: frequent repetition, specific load and training that matches what the race will actually demand.
Jason Koop — Training Essentials for UltrarunningMost outdoor hill sessions take place on Anna’s Berg, a roughly 20-metre hill in Hilversum. I also use the Technogym Climb Excite and Skillrun at SportCity for climbing, power hiking and muscular endurance.
See the six race problems I trainAsker Jeukendrup has influenced how I think about periodised nutrition and gut training: nutrition is something to practise, not improvise on race day.
Asker Jeukendrup — Training the Gut for AthletesIn 2025 I completed a sports medical assessment at OREC for the Monte Rosa Trail. In 2026 I also use OREC preventively for movement-chain assessment, single-leg control and preparation for long descents.
OREC sports medical assessmentLast meaningfully updated: 13 July 2026 — added the Anna’s Berg training block, body-weight context, current OREC information and a clearer training structure.
Mandatory gear for the Nice 100M
Alongside normal running clothing, the organiser requires a substantial list of equipment. I track what is mandatory, what I personally choose and what belongs in my vest or drop bags: headlamps, extra layers, a waterproof jacket, emergency food, power banks, bowl and cup.
Why I share this
My parents-in-law live with dementia. That is why I am running the Nice 100M for Alzheimer Nederland. The preparation is therefore more personal than training for a sporting goal alone.
Early ninja sessions, repeated laps on Anna’s Berg and deliberate rest days all belong to the same campaign. Training is not more important than Alzheimer’s disease; the 100 miles are a way to raise attention and money for something that directly affects our family.
Every filled mile represents part of the route, but also months of planning, training, practising, recovering and continuing to explain why this matters.
Frequently asked questions
By separating the race into demands. Climbing, descending, hiking, eating, darkness, heat and equipment each need different work. I use hill repeats, Anna’s Berg, Technogym Skillrun, Technogym Climb Excite, strength training, long runs and frequent repetition.
Because repetition is useful. The hill is short, but it allows controlled climbing, descending, eating, technique work and fatigue close to home. It is not an Alpine substitute, but it is a practical test slope.
Mainly the Technogym Skillrun for incline work and the Technogym Climb Excite for repeated climbing. They do not reproduce the Alps, but they allow focused work on climbing, hiking and muscular endurance.
Sessions planned early or efficiently so that family life is disrupted as little as possible. The preparation must work athletically and remain sustainable at home.
Nutrition changes with the purpose of the session. A rest day requires something different from a long hill session. During specific work I deliberately practise carbohydrate, fluid, salt and timing so my stomach is not surprised on race day.
The plan defines the intended purpose and limits of a session. Reality determines the execution. If terrain, recovery, family life or pain signals change, I adjust. Doing more is only useful when the session remains specific and the recovery afterwards still works.
Total mass must be decelerated repeatedly on long descents. I aim to reduce unnecessary mass gradually, but not at the cost of strength, recovery or carbohydrate availability. Multi-week trends matter more than daily smart-scale readings.
No. This is my own preparation, not medical, nutritional or general training advice. Other runners need to make decisions appropriate to their experience, health and circumstances.